The ruling was about the Constitution, not a political tantrum
Monday’s segment on The View turned into the usual daytime TV pile-on, with the hosts treating the Virginia Supreme Court’s redistricting ruling like it was some kind of national crisis cooked up in a smoky back room. But the facts are much less dramatic, which is probably why they got so little airtime. The court struck down a proposed 10-1 Democratic congressional map because the process used to get the gerrymander referendum on the ballot violated the Virginia Constitution. That is not a small detail. That is the whole case. The justices did not rule against democracy, and they did not issue a political hit job. They enforced the law, which is still supposed to matter even when cable chatter makes that sound old-fashioned.
Whoopi and the gang went straight for the outrage
Whoopi Goldberg opened by saying Republicans had “cheated” voters, as if a state supreme court enforcing its own constitution had suddenly become a scene from a prison break movie. Alyssa Farah Griffin waved the ruling off as a “technicality” and suggested the justices were working in President Trump’s political orbit, which is a pretty wild leap when Virginia’s justices are appointed by the General Assembly, not the president. Ana Navarro then tried to pin the whole redistricting fight on Trump and Texas, but that storyline falls apart fast when you remember that mid-decade map fights were already brewing in blue states long before Texas entered the chat. The facts are stubborn little things, and they have a nasty habit of ruining a good TV meltdown.
Blue states are not exactly innocent bystanders
House Speaker Mike Johnson pushed back by pointing out that House Democrats helped launch the current mid-decade redistricting battle in New York before the 2024 election. That matters because the people shrieking loudest about fairness often seem perfectly comfortable with map games when the arrows point their way. The hosts later agreed that redistricting changes should happen in places like Illinois and Maryland, which is a funny choice given how those states have nearly erased Republican representation from their congressional delegations. Democrats call it “equity” when they draw maps that protect their side, but when the other side responds, suddenly the sky is falling and the courts are suspicious. It is a neat trick, though a little less impressive once everybody notices the double standard.
When reckless rhetoric starts pointing fingers, people get hurt
The deeper concern in the criticism of the segment was not just that The View got the law wrong, but that this kind of loaded talk can help poison the public square. The piece warned that false claims about judges and justices can feed hostility, and history shows where that path can lead. It pointed to the 2022 attempted assassination of Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh and noted that political rage has already pushed some unstable people toward violence. It also referenced past threats against President Trump and said some of the language used by attackers echoed the overheated tone heard from Democratic politicians and media figures. That should make every decent American stop and think. If public figures keep tossing around reckless accusations like confetti, they should not act shocked when the country gets more dangerous. The truth still matters, even if shouting is easier.
WE’D LOVE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS! PLEASE COMMENT BELOW.
JIMMY
Find more articles like this at steadfastandloyal.com.
Leave a Comment