If you ever wonder what happens when a dose of reality crashes into a wall of feelings, just watch the latest Scott Jennings CNN ICE debate on The Abby Phillip Show. Jennings, one of the few conservative voices allowed in the CNN building without a security escort, found himself trying to have a logical conversation while his fellow panelists threw out claims faster than facts could catch up. One guest insisted ICE isn’t training recruits. Another said agents are “abandoning small children on highways.” No evidence, no sources — just vibes. Jennings’ expression said it all: “We’re really doing this, huh?”
Feelings Don’t Equal Facts
What’s remarkable about this exchange is how confidently some people speak about law enforcement without the faintest idea how it works. Jennings calmly asked for specific examples — not rumors, not tweets, not something “I think I read.” The response? More generalizations, this time about race, training, and even dog-shooting conspiracies. It was like watching a debate where one person brought research and the other brought an emotional support anecdote. The Scott Jennings CNN ICE debate perfectly captured modern media’s problem: volume replaces verification.
The Left’s War on Law Enforcement, One Talking Point at a Time
It’s no secret that many media figures can’t resist painting law enforcement as the villain in every story. ICE, Border Patrol, local police — it doesn’t matter who’s wearing the badge, they’re automatically the bad guys in this narrative. In the Scott Jennings CNN ICE debate, that bias was front and center. When Jennings reminded them that detaining everyone in a raid is standard police procedure, they acted shocked, as if basic law enforcement were some new invention. It’s easier, after all, to accuse ICE of misconduct than to admit they’re enforcing federal law — something that didn’t happen much under Biden’s “let it slide” approach.
Standards Matter — and That’s the Whole Point
The irony of the debate? It started over ICE’s training standards. CNN’s panel tried to spin higher failure rates as proof that something was wrong. Jennings, on the other hand, pointed out the obvious: that’s what standards are for. If someone can’t pass the physical or civics test, they don’t get the badge — plain and simple. That’s not discrimination; that’s accountability. But to some on the left, expecting competence is now controversial. The Scott Jennings CNN ICE debate reminded viewers that lowering the bar doesn’t make the country fairer — it makes it weaker.
Media Bias Is the Real Story Here
The real takeaway isn’t about ICE — it’s about how the media frames law enforcement as the perpetual problem while facts sit quietly in the corner, waiting for someone like Jennings to invite them to the conversation. Every time a conservative brings data, the response is an emotional story. Every time someone asks for evidence, the answer is “Well, it’s happening somewhere.” That’s not journalism — that’s activism with better lighting. Viewers deserve better than a network that confuses feelings with truth. Jennings didn’t just win the argument — he exposed how shallow the conversation has become.
America Deserves More Scott Jennings Moments
Whether you agree with him or not, Jennings showed what real debate looks like: composed, fact-based, and immune to peer pressure. In an era where shouting counts as substance, that’s refreshing. The Scott Jennings CNN ICE debate wasn’t just good television — it was a rare moment of sanity in a media world allergic to it. Facts don’t always make good ratings, but they sure make for better journalism.
WE’D LOVE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS! PLEASE COMMENT BELOW.
JIMMY
We welcome open discussion and thoughtful opinions — even strong disagreements — but comments containing profanity, personal attacks, or hate speech will be removed. Keep it civil, keep it smart, and keep it focused on the ideas.
Find more articles like this at SteadfastAndLoyal.com.
Editor’s Note: This article reflects the opinion of the author.
h/t: Steadfast and Loyal
Leave a Comment