Kamala Harris wasn’t on the debate stage, but she might as well have been, considering the disaster her chosen running mate, Tim Walz, delivered while facing off against JD Vance. The vice-presidential debate was a perfect opportunity for Walz to make a strong case for the Harris agenda, but instead, he fumbled spectacularly. As Jesse Watters aptly put it, Harris’s terrible instincts were on full display through Walz, proving yet again that she lacks the judgment needed to lead.
Walz’s Debate Disasters Show Kamala’s Lack of Judgment
Throughout the debate, it was painfully clear that Tim Walz was outmatched by JD Vance, who delivered a confident, well-reasoned defense of conservative principles. Meanwhile, Walz stumbled through his responses, making headlines for all the wrong reasons. In one of the most bizarre moments, Walz claimed he had befriended school shooters. Yes, you read that correctly. This is the person Kamala Harris wants just a heartbeat away from the presidency.
If that wasn’t enough to raise eyebrows, Walz also got caught in a lie about his presence in Hong Kong during the Tiananmen Square protests. It turns out he didn’t even arrive in Asia until months after the protests ended. When confronted with this, Walz offered little more than a half-hearted apology, saying he “misspoke.” This is the kind of decision-making we’re supposed to trust from Kamala Harris’s top pick?
JD Vance Shines as Walz Fumbles
JD Vance, on the other hand, used the debate as an opportunity to showcase his sharp instincts and common-sense approach to the issues that matter most to Americans. He zeroed in on the economic failures of the Biden-Harris administration, calling out the skyrocketing inflation, rising gas prices, and the unaffordability of basic necessities like groceries and housing. Vance didn’t just point fingers—he backed up his arguments with facts and figures, exposing how Harris and Walz have left middle-class families struggling to get by.
As Jesse Watters pointed out, while JD Vance stood strong and focused on the issues, Walz seemed content to agree with Vance on key points about protecting American workers and standing up to Big Pharma. But even when Walz tried to pander to the audience with vague promises, it was clear he didn’t have the depth or the passion to follow through.
Kamala’s Instincts in Question – Again
If Kamala Harris’s instincts were ever in doubt, her choice of Tim Walz as her running mate should remove any lingering uncertainty. Jesse Watters couldn’t have said it better: Harris is a hollow shell, lacking original thoughts or meaningful leadership. Choosing Walz, a man who fumbles on national television and makes friends with school shooters, is just more proof of her ineptness.
Throughout the debate, Walz didn’t just fail to defend the Harris agenda—he actively hurt it. His weak performance did nothing to inspire confidence in Harris’s ability to lead, and if anything, it highlighted the stark contrast between a candidate like JD Vance, who comes prepared with facts and conviction, and Walz, who appeared out of his depth.
JD Vance: The Future of Conservative Leadership
JD Vance’s debate performance solidified his standing as a rising star in the conservative movement. He came prepared, confident, and most importantly, relatable. Vance spoke to the struggles of everyday Americans, from the rising cost of living to the failures of the pharmaceutical industry. He pointed out how Harris’s policies have made it harder for families to afford basic needs, and he offered real solutions instead of empty promises.
In one particularly memorable moment, Vance drew attention to the fact that much of the pharmaceutical industry is controlled by countries hostile to the U.S. He made a powerful case for why this needs to change—and Walz, predictably, had no real response.
Final Thoughts
Kamala Harris wasn’t on stage, but her presence was felt throughout the debate through the poor performance of Tim Walz. If her judgment is this bad when it comes to picking a running mate, how can we trust her to make the big decisions that affect our nation? As Jesse Watters exposed, Harris is nothing more than an empty suit, and her choice of Walz proves it.
JD Vance, by contrast, demonstrated that he is the future of conservative leadership. He’s sharp, prepared, and ready to stand up for American families. While Walz struggled to keep up, Vance delivered a masterclass in what it means to lead with conviction and common sense.
Kamala Harris may have thought she could hide behind Tim Walz, but as this debate showed, her instincts are as bad as ever. And as the race for the White House heats up, Americans are starting to see just how unfit she is for the job.
WE’D LOVE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS! PLEASE COMMENT BELOW.
JIMMY
Find more articles like this at steadfastandloyal.com.
h/t: Steadfast and Loyal
Leave a Comment