It appears there is a situation involving Judge John J. McConnell Jr., who recently made headlines by halting President Trump’s temporary spending freeze. This move has raised eyebrows, as accusations are now surfacing about the judge’s own financial interests and potential conflicts of interest. It is alleged that Judge McConnell has been involved with a nonprofit organization, Crossroads Rhode Island, which has received a significant amount of government funding over the years, totaling over $128 million. Skepticism has grown as people question whether the judge was motivated by personal gain rather than objective judgment.
Critics point to the association between Judge McConnell and Crossroads Rhode Island, asserting that McConnell has been deeply involved with the organization. Reports claim that he has served on its Board of Directors since 2006 and even held the position of Chair for a decade. Notably, even after ascending to his position as Chief Judge in 2013, McConnell continued to be listed as a Director in the organization’s financial documentation, as seen in its IRS Form 990 filings. America First Legal (AFL) has called for Judge McConnell’s immediate recusal, arguing that his impartiality is compromised due to these ties.
/2 AFL has uncovered evidence suggesting that Judge McConnell appears to be currently serving on the Board of Directors for the non-profit NGO Crossroads Rhode Island, where he was previously the Chair of the Board and is still currently listed as the Chair-Emeritus. pic.twitter.com/rXmdVMN3as
— America First Legal (@America1stLegal) February 16, 2025
“Federal Judge McConnell must recuse himself immediately. AFL has uncovered a major potential conflict of interest for Judge John McConnell, Chief Judge of the federal district court of Rhode Island, who halted President Trump’s temporary spending freeze,” AFL stated on social media platform X. The assertion is that his ruling has helped secure continuous government funding for Crossroads Rhode Island, which is now reportedly receiving even more taxpayer money through state records in 2025.
/4 And, for much of that time, he served as Chair of the Board, a position he held from 2011 through 2021.
Prior to serving as Chair, he was the Vice Chair in 2009 and 2010 and a board member from 2006 to 2008. pic.twitter.com/rDjsWaJlY8
— America First Legal (@America1stLegal) February 16, 2025
/6 AFL’s review of required disclosure forms reveals that since Judge McConnell became Vice Chair of the Board of Crossroads Rhode Island in 2009, the organization has received over $117.6 million in government funding (accounting to the end of 2023).
Crossroads received over… pic.twitter.com/GKNk07jlMr
— America First Legal (@America1stLegal) February 16, 2025
Such revelations bring into question the fairness and integrity of Judge McConnell’s decision-making process. Federal law mandates that judges must disqualify themselves in cases where their impartiality could be reasonably questioned. However, it’s argued that McConnell’s fiduciary connections to Crossroads Rhode Island present a clear violation of this statute, specifically federal law 28 U.S.C. § 455. The public confidence in the judiciary is ultimately at stake, especially when decisions contribute to the financial growth of entities linked to those making the rulings.
In response to these allegations, there are calls for accountability and transparency. Critics demand that Judge McConnell vacate his ruling on the spending freeze and face inquiries related to this ethics breach. The argument is that such actions undermine public trust and create an impression of judicial corruption. It’s essential not to allow judges to exploit their positions to benefit personal interests or projects linked to them.
/12 Federal law, 28 U.S.C. § 455, requires judges to disqualify themselves “in any proceeding in which [their] impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” pic.twitter.com/mOSomMgwUc
— America First Legal (@America1stLegal) February 16, 2025
On the political front, this incident potentially bolsters President Trump’s criticism of certain judicial figures and decisions that have obstructed his policies. Supporters of Trump may view this case as another example of the establishment’s efforts to hinder his agenda, further fueling distrust in what they perceive as a partisan judicial system.
h/t: Steadfast and Loyal
Leave a Comment