Breaking! Adam Schiff approved intel leaks to smear Trump, thought he’d be CIA chief if Hillary Clinton won

Well, well, well… look who’s back in the headlines. Senator Adam Schiff — the Democrats’ patron saint of selective leaks and bad haircuts — is once again accused of doing exactly what we’ve been saying for years. A Democratic whistleblower (yes, a Democrat, so Schiff can’t scream “MAGA conspiracy”) told the FBI that in 2017, Schiff greenlit leaking classified info designed to smear then-President Donald Trump. And according to this whistleblower, Schiff’s plan was clear: weaponize the leak to help indict Trump. You know, the sort of stuff that’s “treasonous” and “illegal” — their words, not mine.

The All-Staff Meeting From Hell

According to FBI documents, Schiff gathered his merry band of House Intelligence Committee Democrats for what must have been the most blatantly corrupt team meeting since Enron’s last board retreat. There, he allegedly told the group they’d leak classified information harmful to Trump, with the goal of nailing him in court. When the whistleblower raised the small matter of this being, oh I don’t know… a crime, the unnamed staffers basically told him, “Relax, we won’t get caught.” Ah yes, the famous Beltway ethics standard.

The System for Smearing Trump

This wasn’t some one-off “oops” moment. The whistleblower says the Democrats on the committee had an entire system for leaking. Step one: sensitive info is passed to Schiff. Step two: Schiff decides who gets to play “Deep Throat” this week. Step three: CNN suddenly “obtains” the details before the ink on the memo dries. One particularly sensitive document was reportedly leaked almost word-for-word within a day — and surprise, Eric Swalwell was in the loop. The whistleblower even got warned that Swalwell had a “reputation” for leaking classified material.

The FBI’s Sudden Interest… Years Later

Here’s where it gets extra swampy. This whistleblower first told the FBI about Schiff’s antics in 2017 — back when the bureau was still busy slow-walking anything that might hurt the anti-Trump narrative. He was interviewed again in 2023, but the Justice Department declined to go after Schiff, citing the Constitution’s Speech or Debate Clause. Apparently, this magical shield covers everything unless you’re a Republican, in which case it barely covers parking tickets.

Karoline Leavitt Brings the Hammer

Fast forward to now, and White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt isn’t mincing words. She called the whistleblower report a “bombshell” and basically dared the media to cover it fairly — knowing full well that’s like asking CNN to run a half-hour special on Biden’s cognitive decline. She even read a quote from FBI Director Kash Patel, admitting that “certain officials” used their positions to “selectively leak classified information to shape political narratives” and “weaponize intelligence” for political gain. Translation: Schiff and friends turned our intel agencies into their own personal opposition research arm.

Schiff’s Office Plays the Same Old Card

Naturally, Schiff’s office is screaming “smear” and “false” and “disgruntled former staffer.” They claim this guy was fired for harassment and “compromising activity on official travel,” which, conveniently, is exactly what you’d say if you needed to trash a whistleblower without addressing the actual allegations. They also point out that Trump’s DOJ and an inspector general didn’t find the whistleblower credible — you know, the same DOJ that was busy protecting the Russia hoaxers in the first place.

Untouchable… Or Finally in Trouble?

Schiff’s been playing this game for years — reading the Steele Dossier into the Congressional record, insisting for ages he had “clear evidence” of collusion (spoiler: he didn’t), and basking in the glow of fawning media coverage. The whistleblower says this was all part of a coordinated operation to get Trump. And here’s the kicker — Schiff is already facing a separate criminal investigation for alleged mortgage fraud. The man’s juggling scandals like a circus act, and maybe, just maybe, the music’s about to stop.

Why This Matters (Even If the Media Pretends It Doesn’t)

If you or I leaked classified info, we’d be doing hard time before we could even Google “prison commissary menu.” But in D.C., if you’re the right kind of politician, you get immunity cloaked as “constitutional protection” and a guest spot on MSNBC. This isn’t just about Trump. It’s about whether powerful people — especially the ones who keep screaming about “protecting democracy” — are held to the same laws as everyone else. Spoiler alert: they haven’t been.

WE’D LOVE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS! PLEASE COMMENT BELOW.
JIMMY

Find more articles like this at steadfastandloyal.com.

 

h/t: Steadfast and Loyal

More Reading

Post navigation

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *