When Bill O’Reilly broke down the latest so-called “scandal” involving Trump’s military strikes on drug-smuggling boats in the Caribbean, you could practically see the smoke coming out of cable news studios nationwide. Meanwhile, Jimmy Kimmel and the late-night crowd treated the operation like it was some kind of slapstick comedy skit—because why take cartel violence seriously when you can score political points? What we actually have is a textbook example of how the media, Congress, and far-left commentators twist reality into a pretzel whenever Trump successfully uses force. The truth: the strikes were legal, justified, and effective. But buckle up—because the people screaming the loudest aren’t very good with facts.
The Fake Scandal Congress Tried to Manufacture
Congress hauled in Admiral Frank “Mitch” Bradley, head of the military operation, to grill him on whether Secretary of War Pete Hegseth ordered him to “kill two smugglers.” The admiral calmly explained that the mission was simple: destroy two heavily armed cartel boats barreling across the Caribbean at 90 mph. No “extra instruction,” no assassination plot, no clandestine war crime. The boats were hit, one boat’s destruction wasn’t fully complete, a follow-up strike finished the job, and two smugglers died because they were still engaged in the armed operation. That’s it. That’s the story. Congratulations to Congress for holding a hearing on something that wasn’t even wrong, questionable, or unusual in military operations. A whole lot of drama for absolutely nothing.
Why the Strikes Were 100% Legal—Despite Cable News Fantasyland
Here’s the legal bottom line that nobody on the Left wants to touch: the President, under Article II of the Constitution, is Commander-in-Chief. He has inherent authority to take direct action against hostile foreign actors posing a threat to national security. On top of that, the Maritime Drug Law Enforcement Act gives the U.S. explicit jurisdiction to target cartel drug-smuggling vessels operating on the high seas. Add in years of precedent supporting interdictions, rapid-response force, and lethal engagement when vessels are armed, and this was not even a gray-area call. It was legal. Crystal clear. Completely justified. You’d know this if you spoke to a military officer, a constitutional lawyer, or literally any adult who has read a government manual. But apparently cable news prefers pretending fishermen with $250,000 speedboats are victims of government overreach.
What the Hell Is Rand Paul Thinking?
And then there’s Rand Paul, who somehow managed to join hands with Schumer, Schiff, and Tim Kaine (a political barbershop quartet nobody asked for) to push a War Powers resolution banning Trump from acting against drug cartels without congressional permission. In what universe does that make sense? The idea that you’re going to stop and hold a Senate vote while cartel boats are ripping across the Caribbean at freeway speeds is the kind of thinking only Washington could produce. Rand Paul usually has moments of clarity, but this wasn’t one of them. You cannot micromanage rapid-strike interdictions from Capitol Hill. You cannot legislate your way through a high-speed water chase. And you absolutely cannot fight armed drug cartels with wishful thinking about “proper process.” This resolution isn’t just misguided—it’s dangerous. Thankfully, it’s also dead on arrival.
Jimmy Kimmel, Rachel Maddow, and the ‘Just Fishermen’ Theory
And of course, we have the comedy wing of the Democratic Party—also known as the “news media”—claiming that the cartel boats “weren’t pointed at the United States” and “might have been fishermen.” Right. Because all normal fishermen travel in $250K high-speed vessels capable of 90 mph, outfitted with radio-jamming tech, narco-modified hulls, and armed crew members. Sure. Totally your casual island hobbyists. Then we get the “How do we know they had drugs on board?” routine. Maybe, just maybe, because U.S. intel follows cartel routes, trafficker patterns, satellite movements, and signal intercepts. But somehow Rachel Maddow knows better from the comfort of her television desk, armed with nothing but a script and a predetermined conclusion that Trump must be wrong. The whole argument collapses under even minimal scrutiny, but hey—why let reality interrupt a perfectly good chance to bash the President?
Bill O’Reilly Breaks Down What the Media Refuses to Admit
While the media gets amnesia about how interdictions work, O’Reilly laid out the obvious: Trump’s military acted within full legal authority, stopped a dangerous smuggling operation, and removed violent cartel actors from the battlefield. That’s called deterrence. That’s called enforcing the law. That’s called winning. Trump didn’t sugarcoat it. He didn’t hide it. He treated the cartels like the dangerous criminal enterprises they are, not potential extras in a Greenpeace documentary. And O’Reilly was right to mock the media’s meltdown—because it wasn’t just wrong. It was embarrassing.
The Real Reason This Story Became a Story
This entire narrative only exists because Trump is president. If a Democrat had launched these exact same strikes, the headlines would have read: “Brave President Takes Bold Action Against Deadly Drug Traffickers.” Instead, because it’s Trump, we get hysterics about “fishermen,” bogus accusations about “war crimes,” and manufactured outrage on late-night TV. The facts don’t matter—only the opportunity for political theater.
Meanwhile, the Cartels Know Exactly What Just Happened
Cartels pay attention. They watch U.S. action. And now they know: under Trump, your $250,000 boat full of narcotics isn’t making it to port. Your crew isn’t outrunning a drone. Your operations are not safe. That’s how you create deterrence—by making the consequences unmistakable and unavoidable. The media may not like it, but the cartels absolutely fear it.
The Bottom Line
The strikes were legal. The targets were cartel smugglers. The mission was justified. The outrage is fake. Congress wasted everyone’s time. The media embarrassed itself. And the only reason this moment didn’t earn bipartisan applause is because Trump was the one making the call. That’s America in 2025: results get criticized, failure gets praised, and fishermen now apparently pilot narco-boats at 90 miles an hour.
WE’D LOVE TO HEAR YOUR THOUGHTS! PLEASE COMMENT BELOW.
JIMMY
Find more articles like this at steadfastandloyal.com.
h/t: Steadfast and Loyal
Leave a Comment